From the archive
Should Congress Revise Federal Laws Against Lying?
“When Justice Ginsburg reviewed his case, her concurring opinion warned that the federal false statements statute arms government agents with authority to generate felonies.”

“When Justice Ginsburg reviewed his case, her concurring opinion warned that the federal false statements statute arms government agents with authority to generate felonies.”
Can law enforcement manufacture crimes against citizens? That question centrally occupied Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in a case, Brogan v. United States (1998), where a union officer was questioned by Labor Department and tax agents. The union official was interrogated about his dealings with a real estate company. As a result of his response, he was charged and convicted of making a false statement to federal agents. When Justice Ginsburg reviewed his case, her concurring opinion warned that the federal false statements statute arms government agents with authority to generate felonies. She referenced informal encounters between agents and their targets resulting in felony convictions. She noted that authorities have resorted to such process crimes when they are unable to prove an underlying substantive offense. In view of current developments in Washington, it is highly relevant to revisit the concerns and dangers exposed by the Ginsburg opinion.
How did it happen that the federal statute became a potentially powerful “generator of crime” as she put it? The law was enacted during the Civil War. It began as an appropriately narrow measure which criminalized written claims for money or property containing false billings. It was designed to protect against bilking the government. Seventy years later it was broadly expanded during the New Deal to proscribe oral statements, including responses to government interrogation.
This expansion caught the eye of Justice Ginsburg. She wrote her opinion “to call attention to the extraordinary authority Congress, perhaps unwittingly, has conferred on prosecutors to manufacture crimes.” Famous defendants like Martha Stewart and Scooter Libby would likely agree with Justice Ginsburg’s concerns. They both felt the sting of current federal law. The whole subject has been awakened afresh in 2018 with the wave of prosecutions against supporters of President Trump.
The rest is for members.
All proceeds go toward publishing more writers and poets.
Free for 30 days, then $3 a month
Become a member
This work is preserved in Merion West’s archive of articles and poems published from 2016 through early 2025. Explore the archive